By Savitha Hira
Photography:
Akshat Jain & Amit Khanna; courtesy the architect
Multi-disciplinary design studio, Amit
Khanna Design Associates from Delhi work towards breaking away from the
typology of apartment blocks in urban Delhi...
Often design begins as a core
problem-solver and builds, taking the project beyond its tangible expectations.
Very recently we featured sky condos that defy typical planning to evolve an architecture that is non-standard and a
programme distribution that is unique. With Cuboid House, an apartment block in
Delhi, which is meant to be rented out at the onset before the owners decide to
live there themselves, the architect rises up to the challenge of building a
strong architectural vocabulary that is independent of the variety of interior
treatments that will inevitably make subjective statements out of each floor.
|
. |
|
. |
As we speak to Ar. Amit Khanna, he
laments the fact that developer-driven apartment blocks have largely overtaken the architectural
vocabulary in urban Delhi, where typically the complete permissible envelope is
occupied and the buildings sport differently treated facades in keeping with
perceived architectural trends. Our observation underlines this as a phenomenon
in urban India. Incidentally, this liberty at being non-contextual and insensitive
to a more cohesive human-environment interaction, is fashionably termed ‘individuality’
that tends to permeate through to every realm that touches us; and by hind
sight, seems more disturbing than constructive.
|
. |
|
. |
Serious issues
these; have led several architects to put on their thinking caps, skew them and
emerge with optimum solutions. Cuboid House is one such solution, where the
building strategically optimizes all of the area permissible by local code, but
redistributes it amongst the various floor levels via a series of open decks that
open up to views on the north-east, facilitating an interior-exterior
interaction. Additionally, this also creates a kind-of dramatic stepped back
elevation as the building rises.
|
. |
|
. |
With a built-up
area of 15000 sq. ft., the project attempts to demonstrate how volumes and material
usage can augment the life and feel of a structure. Two local stones, one grey
(Cudappah), the other sandy brown (Jaisalmer teak), are used to emphasize the
cubic volumes that give this house its name and form its most distinctive
visible element. Added to this is the strategic monitoring of natural light
into what is essentially, a narrow thin building via a 50 ft. tall aluminium
facade element that adds to the luminosity of the interior spaces, without
totally barricading the housemates from the outside world.
|
. |
|
. |
Two
light wells are placed in the main living space; equipped with operable windows
that not only bring light, but also draw out air from the floors and vent from
the terrace. Aesthetically too, they engage, lending a suppleness to the project.
The deep recesses for the windows and large overhangs temper the fierce climate
of Delhi and recall sustainable building traditions, while allowing for views
from within. Here is a project that reinstates that change is a matter of
positive informed choice and need not be construed as a defiance or renaissance
of general mass appeal.
|
. |
|
. |
The design of this building is a refreshing alternative to a 'block' approach - with innovative solutions to bringing natural light into the building - and providing outside space at the upper levels. It's a very pleasing design for appartment living - and seems to sit well in the surrounding area.
ReplyDeleteThis is a super article, and raises a very valid point about the "collaboration agreement" trap which most bungalow owners in Delhi fall into. Having been enticed into a zero-investment redevelopment model by a developer, the landowner is then left with little or no say in the extent of exploitation which has to be done (though she/he does exert some influence over exteriors, interiors, building materials and the like). But since the developer has to bear the entire construction cost (and often to pay an upfront premium to the bungalow owner also), in return for which the developer gets one floor of the completed building, the arrangement inevitably ends up in four identical rectangular floors, making an uninspiring and homogenized cube.
ReplyDeleteThe cuboid house (a name which is more apt to describe the faceless cubes designed by in-house or bespoke architects engaged by the developers) which you've written about is a wonderful departure from the norm, and really refreshing.
Well done.
truely refrshing from traditinal block type appartments..
ReplyDelete